In a product liability lawsuit, Alice (not her real name) argues that Omegle became a “hunting ground for predators” due to the random matching system and the lack of warnings or age verification. Her legal team claims that Omegle is responsible for the harm caused to Alice and hopes to secure her millions of dollars in compensation and force changes to Omegle’s design.
Alice's legal team argues that the case could be a potential watershed moment for product liability lawsuits against social media platforms. In the past year, dozens of other product liability cases have been launched against platforms such as Instagram and Snapchat, but Alice's case - A.M Vs Omegle - is likely to lead the way.
"Mr Brooks did send the BBC a statement. In it he said users of Omegle were "solely responsible for their behaviour" while using his website. He added that Omegle took the safety of users extremely seriously, with moderation by artificial intelligence and human moderators, and had helped law enforcement and organisations working to stop the online exploitation of children." - BBC
The case could test the legal limits of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides legal immunity to online platforms for content posted by third party users. Alice's legal team argues that Omegle was able to become a "hunting ground for predators" due to the platform's design, including its random matching system and lack of age verification.
If the case is successful, it could pave the way for many other victims to come forward with similar cases against social media platforms. Any changes resulting from such lawsuits, in the US or elsewhere, would benefit users of the websites worldwide.
Meanwhile, Omegle's legal team has denied that the website is a haven for predators and argued that the website is not to blame for what happened to Alice. The website's creator, Leif Brooks, did not want to talk about Alice's case and has remained silent. However, he sent a statement to the BBC, saying that users of Omegle were "solely responsible for their behavior" while using his website.
Alice's legal team argues that Omegle's recent changes, including a box that users have to tick to state that they are over 18 before they can enter, are "not sufficient." Alice herself says she would like to see Omegle closed down, as she does not believe that the platform carries enough benefits to justify the harm it can cause to children.
The case is being closely watched around the world, as it could have major consequences for social media companies and their responsibilities for the safety and well-being of their users, especially children.
__________
No comments:
Post a Comment