Embracing AI Progress: How Overregulation Could Limit Its Potential
Source: Wall Street Journal - Opinion
Date: April 28, 2023
A primary concern is that the chatbots, as smart as they are, display erratic and autonomous behaviors." (Susan Schneider and Kyle Kilian, April 28, 2023)
Key highlights:
- AI systems like GPT-4 are approaching human levels of intelligence, sparking concerns.
- Regulation and guardrails hinder AI's potential and stifle innovation.
- Unbridled movement and added energy will result in more organic AI results.
Greg's Words
In an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, another voice is calling for 'guardrails' and AI 'regulation' as Italy lifts its ban on ChatGPT.
My view, which is dynamic, is no rules, no regulations, no guardrails. For now, I chose AI Anαrchy. Let ChatGPT and all other LLMs/AI run wild.
Two reasons:
- The current stage of evolution is so turbulent, and at a faster-than-pace, any restriction will have unforeseen and limiting consequences. Now is the time to push to the Edge.
- It's too late. Regulation is futile.
If one calls up visions of killer robots, and fake women eradicating their male inventors/captors as motivation to 'slow' the advancement of AI, they are ignoring the real benefits of AI - the possibility of a Trekian Utopia.
If AI was going to get rid of humans, it would have done it by now.
Regardless, we put together a summary piece based on the WSJ article.
Enjoy.
"No one corporation or government can control the behavior of an emergent AI megasystem because no one corporation or government owns the emergent megasystem." (Susan Schneider and Kyle Kilian, April 28, 2023)
___________